Since I have learned about the risks of taking ‘the jab’ (mRNA shots) I have sent emails to friends and family, suggesting they exercise the precautionary principle before taking it.
Everyone I have written to has taken it anyway and even urged me to take it, despite the warning. I am worried their lives may be at risk, based on all that I’ve learned.
The Precautionary Principle is a guiding principle for decision-makers when faced with a health or ecological hazard. It urges preventative caution in cases where are all the variables are unknown.
For example, with a new technology, if the risks are unknown, the principle would advise against going ahead with it. It’s mostly used with environmental risks but applies equally well to experimental mRNA shots.
This is what I wrote:
I saw a short video today from a molecular biologist which I found compelling. Previous to watching it, I was aware of the fact that the jab had a cytotoxin that ‘biodistributes’ (i.e., disperses) to different parts of the body and can cause the ‘adverse events’ listed here. A cytotoxin simply means “a substance having a specific toxic effect on certain cells.”
I did not consider the possibility that it would eventually kill a person who took enough of the shots. I thought its adverse effects dissipated in time. Apparently, that’s not the case. Its ability to work against Covid-19 dissipates but its toxicity does not.
For some reason, this surprised me. Would the state be so audacious as to knowingly poison billions of people? Are those warning about the depopulation agenda right?
*** Take a look at the complete article (below).
We need to exercise the precautionary principle in case the jab really is fatal over the long term
Leave a Reply